Apparently, despite family history, it seems I might have a chance of not developing breast cancer.
I've no objections to this (sorry, is that an overshare? We're all adults, here...), but it seems an odd bit of research. One must always ask oneself when examining such claims, "Who stands to gain?"
Best line in the article? "The findings do suggest that there are other causes for breast cancer besides the absence of regular fellatio," Shafteer said. "It's a cause, not THE cause." Can they really claim any causality there? I'm just waiting to hear about the next guy who tries to use that on one of my girlfriends.
You know how to whistle, don't you?